Photo: Julian Vilim, Valentina Körber

The Sex Game

“Can you ban plays? – Not even if they are badly written and badly played. And the world, by golly, is not a kindergarten. (…) A moment’s rest and reflection! In the long run, it becomes too boring to play dead from all the most important circumstances of human reproduction; to play dumb. The categorisation ‘Antiquity’, ‘Middle Ages’, ‘Modern Times’ is basically premature. Round dance here means love round dance. And love here does not mean platonic, but (…) applied love. (…) And between all social classes. (…) So here, too, at least some of the bridging of class differences that is so often sought is realised.”
— Alfred Kerr, Arthur Schnitzler: Reigen. Small theatre. The Day, 24 December 1920
“Among the many affairs of my life, this is probably the last in which mendacity, ignorance and cowardice have surpassed themselves.”
— Arthur Schnitzler
“The biological irony of the double standard is that males could not have been selected for promiscuity if historically females had always denied them opportunity for expression of the trait.”
— Robert Smith, Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Mating Systems

The soldier has sex with the prostitute, the prostitute with the count, the count with the actress and the actress with the poet. And so it goes on and on, because in this play it is instinct and not civilisation that rules. The theatre play “Reigen” (“Round Dance”)  by fin de siècle Viennese playwright and physician Arthur Schnitzler is a loose sequence of ten sketches: In each sketch two people meet for sex and have some conversations, before sex, after sex, and maybe also while having sex. Then one person from the scene reoccurs in the next scene, now with another mating partner, and that is how the round dance builds. This simple but genius dramaturgy and the subject of the play in general were obviously sufficient to create one of the greatest theatre scandals of modernity including politically organized protests, shout outs, canceled performances all across Europe, a brawl in a theatre in Berlin, a brawl in the Austrian parlament and a court trial where actors were accused for the fact of “obscenity”. Arthur Schnitzler himself finally banned the staging of the play in the year 1922 and this ban was intact until no less than 1982. 

What wonderful material for an acting course.

Photo: Konstanze Meindl
Photo: Konstanze Meindl
“At the beginning, I felt a bit like I was in free fall, unsure of where the journey would take me. My understanding of “directing” was that everything was exactly predetermined: where you stand and how you move. But not with Anne. In her lessons, I learnt to just start running – even running into something – and then turn around and start again. In the end, I almost felt like I’d done it myself. What I love about Anne’s lessons is her coolness and her trust in us that something beautiful will emerge. Her appreciative attitude towards us and the freedom to try everything out make her lessons really unique and great. And her laughter is simply infectious!”
Photo: Konstanze Meindl
Photo: Konstanze Meindl

Out came a quite funny performance, including highlights such as a striptease or experiments on the role of skin in audio porn. But first we had to get rid of some moral-but-superficial interpretations. Schnitzler’s dialogues are sophisticated, people never talk in full awareness of what they do, they are deeply subjective, they are blind for the larger whole and, especially in this play, they are driven by forces that are larger than self-control. It is exactly that sharply shaped subjectivity that makes all Schnitzler plays, even this one, which is really among the lighter ones he has written, so hard and objective in their view on the human. Arthur Schnitzler knew well of the various interests at play and he knew that none of the protagonists would give anything as a gift.

A practice of deep reading was a substantial part of the course. We searched for motives and goal-orientation for each character. In order to widen the eye, the students had to contribute  little presentations on topics as sex, contraception, diseases and hygiena in Vienna around 1900, on demographics and urban development of the city, its intellectual and artistic forces , on the above mentioned scandal, on Schnitzler as an author, on Schnitzler as a physician and also on Schnitzler’s not exactly monogamous sexual life. We also fed in a chapter on casual sex by evolutionary psychologist David Buss. 

Photo: Konstanze Meindl
Photo: Konstanze Meindl
“With Anne, we learnt to play real people and not perfectly staged artificial characters. – That may sound like a simple task, but we all realised very quickly that it’s actually not as easy as you think. Anne made it clear to us in her lessons that not everything in interpersonal relationships and interactions is always perfectly choreographed, because it’s the characters’ oopsies, idiosyncrasies and insecurities that make the play lively and interesting.”

Little by little an image emerged: These were all figures without names in a city that was overwhelmed with migrants from the rural areas, who would seek their path upwards on the social ladder, in a city where some would eat from silver spoons but still, like all others, had to expect to die from something as ridiculous as tuberculosis before the age of 40. All of them were putting, whatever capital they had (financial, reputational, sexual) at stake in a gigantic lottery of short term goal-achievement and that would shake the established status hierarchies to the bones.

Photo: Konstanze Meindl
Photo: Konstanze Meindl

This can be seen as tragic, but recognition has also always been the means of comedy. It happened that we found ourselves pursuing the path of laughter. To make it lively we worked on interactionability skills that would allow for physical negotiations instead of only the (much more boring) verbal ones. We found artistic expressions for the eros of passing on a glass of water, for loss of sovereignity when a hand touches a breast, for a twosome falling into each other on a sofa so that the sofa breaks, for a fantasy what the two females would do with the candle under the blanket and for a waltz after a one night stand without knowing the other’s name. So, well, it was also not unpoetic.

The students proudly showed their result in two performances in June 2024 and in another two in December 2024. I thank Markus Hippmann from Schauspielschule Wien for the opportunity to do this project and particularly for artistic freedom.

Photo: Konstanze Meindl
Photo: Konstanze Meindl

Students

Actors: Eda Bardakci, Paula Cervenka, Valentina Körber, Stefan Krismann, Clemens Lüer, Michael Meier, Andrea Müller, Paul Peham, Katharina Podiwinsky, Kathrin Poinstingl, Lisa Ringhofer, Sarah Schuster, Sandra Stani

Director’s Assistant: Roland Dietz, Pia Lettner

Photo: Konstanze Meindl
Photo: Konstanze Meindl

 /